The repeated television interviews Zapatero Gabilondo are part of the paradigm of the ceremony for the confusion. The interviewee knows that "playing house", so let it go a little further. The traditional emptiness of the "spirit" - a kind of escape from reality on the basis of what Italians call 'buonismo' - is replaced by another kind of emptiness, ignoring even the ignorant that others may not be of sad condition.
In the last interview of the couple came up with the alternative of interventionism and economic liberalism. It was just that (is said with irony) and also considered generic. There was less realistic than 'The Persiles and Sigismunda work. "
However, there was not the slightest hint of a major democratic changes of the twentieth century, affecting the above dichotomy. Is to overcome this antagonism by means of institutional self-government. This is an administrative and political model that starts from the English Revolution, which was promoted by American and who today is made by the European Union, as well as all the great democracies.
involves the implementation of regulatory and supervisory institutions independent of the executive, but who have, within the scope of its powers, powers that previously exclusive to, as well as other regulatory and even order judicial. Here we are far away. We have not a self-governing body of judges worthy of its name, while the public media is bound and tied it for political power shift. There are as usual, covered with varnish.
in Britain are called quangos (Quasi Autonomous Non-Governametal Organisations ') or' Non-Departmental Public Bodies. " In the United States, "Independent Regulatory Agencies." In France, 'Autorités Indépendante Administrative Affairs. " That have been taken by France, the homeland of 'Droit Administratif' - historically antagonistic to institutional self-government and in particular the 'rule of law' British - shows the extent and universality of change.
Here, in the public debate, this topic does not exist, even though it should be a priority, because it is urgent to reduce the scope of political and administrative power, ie the State to reduce its huge perimeter. The so-called rule of autonomy has not reduced at all, but rather has increased, while that generated confusion. We have a great Leviathan but many, when in fact take the currency - and within globalization - had had to imply the opposite.
Anyone with a minimum interest the public can perceive things that the politicization of everything politicized in the context of a political power that preserves an archaic verticality, with expansion up to the ridicule of the old dichotomy between left and right not in the public interest. You can also view the public interest to leave the market or the economy, or anyone, is not the solution. In all models tested so far untouched corruption continued and sometimes increased.
approach the subject from below and from the concrete, remember the chilling spectacle offered by the ineffable live Magdalena Alvarez, on the occasion of the air disaster Barajas. It was found that a complex and important issue - both human and economic - such as air traffic was in the hands of someone who knew nothing about aviation, administrative, or anything. It was the old political power in a pure state, but counterparts of knowledge, responsibility, sound regulation and effective supervision. There is no other solution than building in aeronautical authority of a strong, independent and effective government. The same is true in many more orders from health informatics.
Yet nineteenth-century conception of raw power political - that preserves the unitarity of the absolute monarchies - for a English company, which is complex and modern, with the exception precisely their political-administrative apparatus. Indeed, the creation of independent authorities in Spain has been reduced to a minimum, except when played by the European imperative. Can anyone imagine what would have happened in the current crisis if they had survived the old structures of the Bank of Spain? Here
political and administrative dysfunction seems to be a non issue. When you teach your ears (yesterday, today, tomorrow) is the top with anything. Unitarianism Jacobin endures, with the ominous corporatism counterweight different, and even at regional level has increased. Territorial gender confusion increases the weight of a slab of freedom, at a time when, with a multiplicity of territorial powers or not, the state's inability to take on new roles is always present. But we're going to do: some do not want to limit their enjoyment of power and others hope to enjoy in the future. The inherent psychological pleasure enjoyment marginalizes the urgent need for reform of a political-administrative water was before the crisis and continue to do so afterwards.
published in malvasíaBlog 
0 comments:
Post a Comment