Inflamed Carlidge In Knee

Judge Garzón earned a substantial income during their stay in the U.S. and the Supreme Court considered that it might incur in default for failing to declare this income to the General Council of the Judiciary. It is what it touches.

Along the way you forget the origin of such funds - the Banco Santander, which is why the attorney Panea filed the application. That does not touch.

News in The Confidential

The controversy surrounding Baltasar Garzón continues to grow. The Supreme Court has denounced a car that the judge of the Audiencia Nacional hid the General Council of Judicial Power (CGPJ) recovery of $ 203,135 during his stay between March 2005 and June 2006 as a visiting professor at New York. Garzón took leave of "teaching and research" to participate as a director, moderator and speaker at a lecture organized by the King Juan Carlos Center at the University of New York.

The judge withheld the salary he would receive to get study leave, as it also continued to gain his basic salary of the Audiencia Nacional. So says the Supreme Garzón CGPJ not informed the "perception of salary through payroll, merely referring to suffrage bills." The High Court also stated that "the amounts received would exceed the limits set by law 53/1984 of 23 December , for the course of activities authorized for support to public office ", even" assuming that implicitly includes such license compatibility. "

Therefore, the Supreme Court stated that "should refer evidence of this resolution and the documents received on the matter to the effect that the General Council Judiciary considers appropriate. " CGPJ will now decide the punishment for this fact Garzon, considered a "very serious."

El Centro Rey Juan Carlos I assumed the payment of travel expenses Garzón worth $ 21,152, and the education of the daughter of the judge at the United Nations International School in the amount of 21,650 dollars. The University paid $ 160,333.14 Garzón by way of salary.

The order of the Supreme responds to a complaint by lawyer Antonio Panea , filed in June 2008 in who accuse Garzón of bribery and malfeasance. According to the complaint, the Santander Group sponsored the conference moderated by Garzon, and on his return to Spain, the judge promptly filed a complaint against Santander, although initially considered that it had "characteristics that presume the existence of a criminal offense. " The Supreme Court has not found any relation between two events, and has rejected the existence of any relevant criminal conduct Garzón. However, the Supreme Court itself has found that Garzon punishable hide their remuneration in New York.

Blogged with the Flock Browser posted

malvasíaBlog