Monday, March 30, 2009
Green Green 13 Uncensored Version

Thursday, March 26, 2009
Green Beans Microwave Flame
Information obtained from the Confidential :
"Citizens are fed up much dirt in English politics, we are losing confidence in the system and the European Parliament elections are less than three months, "signed by over 600 groups that have joined forces in a joint statement issued on the subject of the boycott among MEPs of PP and PSOE against Auken report on the English urbanism. The report, devastating for the brickbats he has suffered this country, will be voted in the European Parliament plenary session on 26 March.
The undersigned groups criticize the English urbanism puts at defenseless citizens who have the misfortune to be smallholders soil, whether rustic or urban and blame him for destroying the country and much of the historical and cultural heritage of Spain. Also doubt the regional laws, which offer no guarantee of fairness and justice.
also criticized the regional planning laws, and even the State Land Act, institutionalizing the figure of developers, responsible for the abuses and atrocities that have occurred in implementing the land laws. And do not hesitate to attribute to this urban predator responsibility for the crisis, recession and economic depression living Spain, and the dramatic evolution of unemployment.
Reviews political corruption and Justice
corruption associated with urban policy does not escape criticism. "We can boast of something internationally, being one of the most corrupt countries in Europe," they say. The paper highlights that in the midst of the recession-depression we suffer, the major political parties are dedicated to airing their dirty laundry, which are many, as the corruption that afflicts us is attributable mostly to politicians at all levels in active , assigned to these parties, because politically it is more profitable to sink the rival to solve the problems of the English.
Similarly the Auken report, people cry out against the English courts, which was branded as slow, expensive and, worse, is tainted by political influence. "The English would like to enjoy a law that truly was an independent power, separate and distinct from the executive power, but powerless witness the sad spectacle of the shameful scramble who lead the major parties to control the formation of organizations such as the Constitutional Court or the Council the Judiciary, reported.
complainants groups, among which are Urban Abuses No, Citizen Advocacy Coordinator Planning and the European Harmed by the Coastal Act, specifically criticizing the Coastal Act, passed more than 20 years, who "plays with the rights of the English."
Margrete Auken 2008 755463es Publish

Monday, March 9, 2009
Inflamed Carlidge In Knee
Along the way you forget the origin of such funds - the Banco Santander, which is why the attorney Panea filed the application. That does not touch.
News in The Confidential
The controversy surrounding Baltasar Garzón continues to grow. The Supreme Court has denounced a car that the judge of the Audiencia Nacional hid the General Council of Judicial Power (CGPJ) recovery of $ 203,135 during his stay between March 2005 and June 2006 as a visiting professor at New York. Garzón took leave of "teaching and research" to participate as a director, moderator and speaker at a lecture organized by the King Juan Carlos Center at the University of New York.
The judge withheld the salary he would receive to get study leave, as it also continued to gain his basic salary of the Audiencia Nacional. So says the Supreme Garzón CGPJ not informed the "perception of salary through payroll, merely referring to suffrage bills." The High Court also stated that "the amounts received would exceed the limits set by law 53/1984 of 23 December , for the course of activities authorized for support to public office ", even" assuming that implicitly includes such license compatibility. "
Therefore, the Supreme Court stated that "should refer evidence of this resolution and the documents received on the matter to the effect that the General Council Judiciary considers appropriate. " CGPJ will now decide the punishment for this fact Garzon, considered a "very serious."
El Centro Rey Juan Carlos I assumed the payment of travel expenses Garzón worth $ 21,152, and the education of the daughter of the judge at the United Nations International School in the amount of 21,650 dollars. The University paid $ 160,333.14 Garzón by way of salary.
The order of the Supreme responds to a complaint by lawyer Antonio Panea , filed in June 2008 in who accuse Garzón of bribery and malfeasance. According to the complaint, the Santander Group sponsored the conference moderated by Garzon, and on his return to Spain, the judge promptly filed a complaint against Santander, although initially considered that it had "characteristics that presume the existence of a criminal offense. " The Supreme Court has not found any relation between two events, and has rejected the existence of any relevant criminal conduct Garzón. However, the Supreme Court itself has found that Garzon punishable hide their remuneration in New York.