Find all 
In a previous post we have referred to the extent it has in Peru and other Latin American countries of the verb pluralization
have , which in this case given in the form of the subjunctive have
(instead of
has ). In this case the reporter not only fails to correct the spontaneous expression the lawyer (it seems perfect), but chooses to emphasize those words-that are the last of the interview, in the headline. It does not look bad to the interviewee, and that no one will realize the detail and no one, except in other countries think is wrong, but because it actually says what you think is important and is a positive desire for the future .
pluralization have is a mistake that is becoming the norm in a landslide. Teachers and Language Academies tend to admit.
In a previous post we have referred to the extent it has in Peru and other Latin American countries of the verb pluralization have , which in this case given in the form of the subjunctive have (instead of has ). In this case the reporter not only fails to correct the spontaneous expression the lawyer (it seems perfect), but chooses to emphasize those words-that are the last of the interview, in the headline. It does not look bad to the interviewee, and that no one will realize the detail and no one, except in other countries think is wrong, but because it actually says what you think is important and is a positive desire for the future . pluralization have is a mistake that is becoming the norm in a landslide. Teachers and Language Academies tend to admit. 
